What's New

Chlamydia


BMC Family Practice 2008, 9:17doi:10.1186/1471-2296-9-17

 

Research article

 

Conversant or clueless ? Chlamydia-related knowledge and practice of general practitioners in Western Australia

 

Meredith J Temple-Smith 1 , Donna Mak 2,3 , Jan Watson 4, Lisa Bastian 2 , Anthony Smith 5 and Marian Pitts 5

 

1  Primary Care Research Unit, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

2  Department of Health Western Australia, Perth, Australia

3  School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, Australia

4  Department of Human Services, Victoria, Australia

5  Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Australia

 

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/9/17

 

Published: 29 February 2008

 

© 2008 Temple-Smith et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

 

Background

A survey of Western Australia's general practitioners' (GPs') knowledge and practices relating to genital chlamydia infection was conducted in mid-2005, prior to a multi-media campaign which encouraged 15–24 year olds to seek chlamydia testing through their general practitioner (GP). The survey aimed to raise GPs' awareness of chlamydia in preparation for the campaign and to establish a baseline measure of their chlamydia-related knowledge and practices.

Methods

All 2038 GPs registered on the Australian Medical Publishing Company's database as practising in Western Australia were sent a survey which covered clinical features of chlamydia, investigations, treatment and public health issues; 576 (29%) responded.

Results

Most GPs were aware of chlamydia being common in the 20–24 year old age group, but less than half were aware that it is common in 15–19 year olds. GPs missed many opportunities for chlamydia testing in patients likely to be at risk of STIs, largely because they thought the patient would be embarrassed. It is of concern that public health responsibilities in relation to chlamydia, ie notification and contact tracing, were not undertaken by all GPs.

Conclusion

Australia is currently piloting chlamydia screening. For this to be successful, GPs will need to maintain current knowledge and clinical suspicion about chlamydia, and be comfortable in asking and receiving information about sexual behaviours. Only then will GPs have a significant impact on curbing Australia's ever-increasing rates of chlamydia.



 

Full Text article at : http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2296/9/17

 

Also available as PDF document

 


Disclaimer:

Information on this site is provided for educational purposes only and is not meant to substitute the advice provided by your own physician or other medical professionals.
Consult your own physician regarding the applicability of any information listed on this website with respect to your symptoms or medical condition



Disclaimer